Jurisdiction

Viewing the 🇺🇸 United States legal version. Automatically matched from request context as 🇺🇸 United States (US).

MiCA

MiCA Compliance Statement

PulsAI’s current regulatory position relative to MiCA and adjacent crypto-asset services regulation.

Version: 1.0
Effective: 1 June 2026
Framework: MiCA not directly applicable; EU references remain informational only

Overview

Good-faith legal position

This page explains PulsAI’s current good-faith position on whether the service falls outside CASP licensing requirements because it is designed as an analytics and information product rather than a personalized crypto-asset service.

It is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel before launch in a regulated market.

01

The Core Legal Question

The key question is whether PulsAI’s signals amount to personalized recommendations about crypto-assets or remain general analytical outputs available to all users on the same basis.

02

PulsAI Position

  • Signals are generated from market data and model logic, not from the user’s financial profile.
  • Outputs are framed as informational only and do not compel action.
  • The product does not execute, route, or place orders.
  • Read-only integrations are used for visibility, not for asset control.
03

The Gray Area

Regulatory uncertainty

The boundary between information tools and regulated advice is still evolving. Language, marketing claims, user segmentation, and product functionality can all affect how a regulator interprets the service.

04

Services PulsAI Does Not Provide

  • Custody or administration of crypto-assets
  • Operation of a trading venue
  • Execution of orders on behalf of clients
  • Portfolio management
  • Transfer services for crypto-assets
05

Travel Rule and Transfer Obligations

Travel Rule and transfer obligations are not currently triggered by PulsAI’s product scope because the platform does not initiate or facilitate crypto-asset transfers.

06

AI Act Considerations

PulsAI also monitors obligations that may arise under the EU AI Act and comparable frameworks. Current positioning assumes the product is not a high-risk AI system under the categories most often discussed for public-sector or essential-services use cases.

07

Commitment to Compliance

  • Monitor regulator guidance on crypto-asset analytics products
  • Seek external legal review before launch in sensitive jurisdictions
  • Adjust product language and functionality if regulatory interpretation changes
  • Pursue licensing only if and when the business model requires it
08

Contact

Regulatory contact
hello@pulsai.live
Primary authority reference
SEC / CFTC and relevant state regulators